Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:13

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is your review of House of the Dragon, season 2, episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why do so many 18 to 29-year-old men struggle in dating?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Do all you people that took the "jab" feel lied to yet?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Meta buys a nuclear power plant (more or less) - TechCrunch
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Can you name a song with the word 'why' in it?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.